The elite and the masses
attend different classes, metaphorically speaking, politically especially. Hence,
the difference in their dressing, especially intellectually. Thus their views
are inevitably divergent because of the nature of their nurturing. This doesn’t
mean that each is fated to cling to their respective perspectives. Yet conciliation
begins when each lends a willing ear to better understand the other’s fear,
which is the basic root of division and all other antagonisms. Yet the less they
talk the more they balk at values and views that serve as fuses to inflame
dissent. Even then, however, the masses are meant for better. Yet better can only be achieved when they
come together under the banner of their common humanity rather than maintaining
the insanity of class, color and other codes that keep them at opposite poles,
morally especially. In fact in this climate morality is messy and suggestive of
world views that only serve to light the fuse until tempers flare and truth ceases
to care for the soul. At least that’s how it seems when things explode. Plainly
speaking, democracy is wreaking with an odor that disrupts the order its ideals
are intended to bring; likewise the dignity it is designed to promote beyond
the fact that citizens vote. What good is the ballot when we sell ourselves for
the carrot discretely dangled before our eyes? How in this climate can citizens
rise even as democracy supplies the means of social reform? It isn’t, however,
a reductionist question of either/or because nature is generous when we confess
our faults and acknowledge the fears that incite the division which today
smears democratic garments all because our arguments are intended to defend the
narrow ends for which we aim. Some even do so in God’s name!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment